Apple is no computer hardware or software company, Apple belongs to the media industry.

Apple redesigns your living roomApple is a media company in everything it does. An extremely innovative organization, Apple has been draining on many different markets: software (less and less), hardware, consumer electronics, entertainment e-Commerce, and retail. The only thing these things have in common is, apart from their great design, their characteristics of media.

The word media comes from the latin word mediare basically meaning “to stand, sit, lie, or be in the middle”. Apple products stand in the middle of you and something else.

Let me take the reasoning further: Apple not only is a media company, Apple is a multi-media company. Apple belongs to the show industry! Not quite convinced yet? Wait a minute. As you would do in geopolitics, when you think about where a country – or company, is heading to, you take a look at its leader’s biography.

  • Is it really a coincidence if Steve Jobs, when he was fired from Apple quite some time ago, went to found Pixar, a major Hollywood graphics studio? Probably not in the show industry by chance. My guess is that Apple is a replication of what emerged in Jobs’ mind during his time at Pixar, where he lacked resources, brand power and the marketing teams to achieve in making the company converge towards his vision.
  • Take a look at this video, an extract from a 1997 Steve Jobs Keynote found on one of French very good blogger Julien Codorniou posts. Introducing a partnership between two great rival companies that have been shaping the computer industry landscape, namely Microsoft and Apple, Steve Jobs does nothing else than acting. Still not buying that Apple is a show company? Whether you do buy or not (yet), here’s an extract from Mike Evangelist’s “Behind the magic curtain” (The Guardian Unlimited Technology, January 5th 2006): “The big keynotes require a very large crew with separate teams for each major task. One prepares the room to seat several thousand people. Another group builds the stage with its motorised pedestals, risers, trap doors, and so forth. A third manages the stage lighting, audio and effects.Yet another sets up and calibrates the state-of-the-art projection systems (complete with redundant backup systems), and a huge remote video truck parked outside has its own crew handling video feeds for the webcasts and playback of any video needed during the show. Then there are the people who set up all the computers used in the keynote, each with at least one backup that can be instantly brought online with the flick of a switch.

    And of course there’s the secrecy. The impact of Steve’s presentations depends on surprise; so once the rehearsals begin, security people help keep the curious out and the secrets secret. It was fascinating to watch. No detail was overlooked: for example, while rehearsing the iDVD demo, Steve found that the DVD player’s remote control didn’t work from where he wanted to stand on the stage. The crew had to make a special repeater system to make it work.

    So when Steve steps out on that stage, with its stark black-on-black colour scheme, and does his apparently simple demos, he brings the combined energy and talent of all those people and many more back in Cupertino, California, and channels it to the audience. It makes me think of a magnifying glass used to focus the power of the sun on one small spot until it bursts into flames.” Click here to read the full article, Mike Evangelist’s “Behind the magic curtain” (The Guardian Unlimited Technology, January 5th 2006).

Apple’s core business is to empower you to devise your show-time corner at home, in the subway or at the office: an entertainment multimedia system. Apple belongs to the show business.

Related posts:

  1. Apple Expo 2006 starting in a few hours – get ready / & why Steve Jobs isn't giving a Keynote
  2. Microsoft will not FOLLOW Apple in phones
  3. This June: Apple will start selling software for Windows
  4. An extensive guide to starting up a software company by Paul Graham
  5. The state of media 2.0 – challenges and opportunities

  • Well done. I think this is your best researched article yet.



    That said, I'm not sure if Apple will ever make a full commitment to being "media." The demand for professional software and hardware from Apple is still relatively high, and will be there even if the media-frenzy dies down.
  • I'd still argue that just like with software, this media they sell, is just a bait for people to buy Apple hardware. In my opinion, to understand what a company does is to look where it makes its money (f.e. Google = Advertising).



    Apple's core business is to sell Apple hardware. Apple does not create, publish, market music, movies or anything "media". Apple's revenue from selling music and movies through iTunes are probably really small, but anyway nothing compared to the revenue from iPods and computers.



    Because Steve Jobs, Pixar's former CEO and Disney's board member, can leverage his experience and influence in show/media business, Apple has advantage in these markets. The success of iPod was capitalized by Apple, but not probably planned. In the beginning it was nothing more, in words of John Gruber, than "a $399 5 GB Mac-only MP3 player". As Vincent points out, Apple has not forgotten its Pro-market, which only link to "show business" is that creative professionals have traditionally used Apple's gear.



    Apple is very much Steve Jobs, that I agree with. But I think that analzying Apple through Jobs is a mistake.



    Repeat after me, Apple is a hardware company...
  • Vincent> thanks!



    Kari> Take a look at what I write sooner in this blog's history:

    "iPod´s lack of interoperability confirms the underlying strategic move Apple´s CEO Steve Jobs has made. Apple is exiting step-by-step the software industry in which Microsoft Windows KO-ed Mac OS a long time ago - to do what it does best (design and marketing), & become a consumer hardware devices pure-player, reproducing Microsoft´s monopolistic economics."

    Source: http://jeremyfain.wordpress.com/2006/07/04/thin...



    As you may have understood, I'm trying to provoke. I aknowledge the fact that Apple is acting more and more like a consumer electronics (hardware if you like) company. But it is also a media company, in the sense of a company that stands between entertainment consumers and entertainment artists (music, video, graphic design, etc.).



    Moreover, Apple definitely belongs to the Show industry, and I pretty much disagree with you on you stance "analzying Apple through Jobs is a mistake". Could you analyze Iran today without taking a look at Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's bio? Okay, very, very bad comparison (cf. geopolitics in the above post) since Steve Jobs intends to make our lives more comfortable and handy when Ahmadinejad has nihilistic views about the future of the world, but my point is that leaders matter.
  • Jeremy, you might be right that looking at leaders' biographies works in geopolitics, so Iran&Ahmadinejad-example is a bit redundant. I never doubted that, but is it applicable in IT industry? More interesting would be how Google looks like if you look it through Brin and Page (and Schmidt). (
  • (stupid wordpress, didn't like my "smaller-than - dash" arrow)



    [...it through Brin and Page (and Schmidt). (] idea for a blog entry, perhaps?)



    The title of your post is "Apple is no hardware [...] company" and now you say that it is also a media company =) Backtracking a bit? Anyway, you're right that Apple in a sense stands between consumers and artists and fills this gap with... (wait for it) ...hardware.
  • Brin and Page have indeed forged what I should call The Google Mindset. I recommended some time ago this very telling article about how the founders shaped the culture of the company: http://jeremyfain.wordpress.com/2006/08/26/an-1...
blog comments powered by Disqus

Staypressed theme by Themocracy