2 resolutions for 2007: visit a cluster of innovation every year & brush up my programming skills

I eventually came up, though a bit late, with a brand new set of 10 resolutions for myself in 2007. I have chosen to display 2 of these resolutions, 2 resolutions that aren’t really private and that I believe should become best practices, at least for people already or entering in the software industry.

1) First resolution: I will thorougly visit at least one cluster of technological innovation every single year, to keep track of what’s happening, spot opportunities, and get a better understanding of the global product and talent market

By visiting, I mean sightseeing of course, but also make sure I understand the innovation pipeline in the area, know about all hot start ups upon leaving, meet entrepreneurs there, visit a university or a research center, etc.

By cluster of innovation, I mean a buzzing place where entrepreneurs, venture capitalists and R&D brain power is available. Amongst these you may find:

  • in the US: Mecca (the Silicon Valley of course), Massachussets Route 128, Austin TX, Seattle – Vancouver
  • in the EU: Paris (I’m currently writing this very post from the Plateau de Saclay where a lot of things are happening), Helsinki, Sophia Antipolis, Lyon, Switzerland, Estonia, Southern London, Berlin, etc. There are actually many, many places in Europe. These places just turn out not to be as concentrated and focused on innovation as the US clusters so it won’t be as interesting and easy probably.
  • in the Middle East: Israel (I usually go there at least once a year so it should be okay), Dubaï (? I’m not sure anything is happening in software; I know Jordan isn’t bad in telcos and actually went there already: true their network’s good but couldn’t figure out if there were any clusters)
  • Asia & Oceania: Singapore, Taiwan, Beijing, Shanghaï, Bangalore, Madras – Chennai, Bombay, Melbourne, Sidney

And the list is far from exhaustive. Of course, outside the few places in Europe that may present an interest, the most pregnant places are all those in the US, Bangalore, and Israel. As far as this very year (2007) is concerned, I feel I need to breathe the air of the Silicon Valley. I’ll save some money and try to make it to the Valley in either November or December 2007. I’ll keep you updated anyways. If you live there or just happen to be there for a while, give me a buzz via e-mail, MSN messenger or Skype.

To wind up, my first resolution is to visit at least one cluster of innovation every single year. Of course, I’m opened to all travelling recommendations so feel free to let me know if there’s a hot place I seem not to know about yet.

2) Second resolution: although I won’t be a core business guy in the business of software (software developers are) but rather a management – business development – sales – marketing sort of profile, I’ll make sure I keep getting better in programming despite a busy schedule (meaning basically hack code at night and in the week ends, and read Bruce Eckel’s books during vacations)

Indeed, I’ll be entering the software industry upon graduation, and in the business of software, those who lead the cattle are the software developers. Open a restaurant, and the person with most clout will be the chef. Take a pharmaceutical company, the most powerful department is likely to be chemistry R&D. Look at any soccer team: those who make most money are the players, not the coach, definitely not the referree. So start a software start up, and the best treated guys on the floor will be the software developers. This is logical: core business guys are always kings, a rule of thumb even more true in brain-intensive businesses like technology.

As a non core business guy (I’ll be probably move between business development, marketing, sales, general management functions), one of my main challenges will be to be to always make sure I at least understand a little bit of what I’m talking about. Many, too many sales or marketing people have no clue of what a software really is. Since I’ll be interacting with former or current software developers a lot, I believe a great deal of my credibility will come from my ability to at least get a grasp of what I’m being told, and ask the right questions.

That’s why I believe I should stick to programming. I’m still doing very simple stuff, in other words a beginner. But one of my resolutions is to keep developing this crucial skill as I’m definitely not on the techie scheme. By the same token, I’ll try to take advantage of the situation to bridge the gap between software developers and business developers, explaining the former why they need the latter (as far as the reciprocal assertion is concerned, I guess it’s pretty clear for all parties).

Business Objects founder Bernard Liautaud's advice for Europeans approaching the US market

I’m more and more trying to use this blog as a place where I keep track of the best stuff I come accross here and there. And this video, found on founder of vPod.tv Rodrigo Sepulveda Schulz’s very entertaining blog, of software company Business Objects co-founder Bernard Liaudaud definitely is something extremely valuable (and I mean it: EXTREMELY VALUABLE) I felt compelled to share with you. As Julien pointed out recently, Bernard Liautaud (alongside with his partner Denis Payre) is a role model for the new generation of aspiring entrepreneurs I belong to. For those of you with no bandwidth to download the file (70 Mbytes) or who read my blog from the office and hence can’t play a video, I tried to compile a digest of what was said in the video and written on the speaker’s slides (published without permission ;-) ). Here it is:

Top 8 mistakes:

  1. Thinking the US is just another territory (it’s the biggest market, at least in software)
  2. Thinking products matter most (it’s the sales, stupid!)
  3. Underestimating marketing (if you build a top product but can’t sell, your product can’t be built anymore; if you sell a good enough product, you can still build a top product)
  4. Underestimating category leadership (Americans know who leaders are and don’t care about those coming second or third in their category; position yourself in a definite category and make sure you become the leader of your category)
  5. Missing the impact of industry analysts (eg. Gartner; Europeans don’t feel like spending time with Gartner analysts because they believe these former product managers don’t understand their business. Big mistake! Analysts at Gartner and Forrester are highly influential and have a lot of impact on enterprise IT procurement, especially in the US. European companies should learn to devote time to training analysts to understand their products better; I just realized I had also started to look down at analysts, see this post; should change this quick)
  6. Poorly adapted hiring tactics (Europeans should learn the American way of thinking: standards are just different. Although it’s equal in value, an American will tend to be more attracted to a package of 10m stock options @ 1$ an option than by a package of 10 stock options priced @$1m an option)
  7. Failing to understand sales people (in the US: the more variable the compensation, the better)
  8. Ignoring known cultural differences (eg there’s a bigger divide between France and the US than between the UK and the US so you may start with the UK; the French love complexity whereas the Americans love simplicity, are optimistic and fast decision makers as opposed to Continental Europeans).

7 take aways:

  1. Taking the US market can be done
  2. & must be done to be successful worldwide
  3. Treat it with respect
  4. Don’t be intimidated by the big US market
  5. Don’t wear European sleeves
  6. Think ‘marketing’ not ‘product’
  7. & don’t be afraid to adapt the organization to the US market from Day 1

Bonus points: interesting links

In English:

  • Tech roundtable with Bernard Liautaud on Jeff Clavier’s blog (a French VC in the Valley who specializes on software) here
  • Interview from March 2005 from datawarehouse review Kalidoscope here
  • Q&A with Liautaud on Silicon.com here
  • BusinessWeek on Liautaud here

In French:

  • Rencontre avec Bernard Liautaud, an interview innovation strategy consultant & ex VP marketing @ MS France Olivier Ezratty, published in la Revue des Centraliens (both Bernard Liautaud and Olivier are Ecole Centrale Paris alumni); see the interview here
  • Journal du Net on Liautaud there

What’s in it for you

Bernard Liautaud, a bright engineer, had partnered with Denis Payre, a management guy, to form Business Objects – now the world leading business intelligence software company. I think BO is a model that may be iterated, provided that the chosen niche proves to be fruitful. So, if you’re okay with the perspective of me being the business guy, I’m officially looking for a software engineer to start building, some day in the upcoming decade or so, a world leader in the software industry. Only requirement: you must have a 4-digit IQ (to compensate with mine). If you like the idea, fell free to contact me so that we can meet up.

In response to Guy Kawasaki's "VC Wishlist": The Entrepreneur Wishlist

Good stuff – as usual, from , from Guy Kawasaki, a prominent blogger & VC in the Valley, who recently posted on his blog an interesting article entitled “The Venture Capitalist Wishlist” (click here to get to read the actual post). However, I’m afraid this time “Wise Guy” misses the point a little bit.

As a matter of fact, there has recently been more cash available at VC houses than entrepreneurs looking for financing. For once, supply excesses demand. Supply excessed demand because institutional investors, who have been doing very wel in the recent years, pour in money into VC bank accounts for them to look for and detect tomorrow’s YouTube or Skype. Venture capitalists compete on funding, which explains why valuations have raised so sharply recently in all buzzing industries. And when valuations go up, internal rates of return are mechanically likely to go down. So, Guy Kawasaki’s the VC wishlist might become useful some day when the cycle’s down from the entrepreneurial view point.

The current zeitgeist clearly suggests indeed that, far from having entrepreneurs finding themselves short of financing when starting up or feeling like developing a business, it’s the venture capitalists who die for feeding projects with their cash. So, I felt an Entrepreneur Wishlist rather than a VC Wishlist would be most useful to help VCs pitch entrepreneurs best. Having worked on both sides for short periods of time as a trainee, I felt I probably had insights to share, although I believe this post will be far from being close to equalling serial entrepreneurs &/or experienced venture capitalists like Guy Kawasaki.

Well, let’s stop beating around the bush. Preliminary time is over. Venture capitalists, here are the top 10 ways to attract the interest of entrepreneurs. There’s no guarantee that if you do these 10 things you’ll be assured to detect and become an investor at tomorrow’s MSFT, CSCO or GOOG. But this wishlist will for sure get you in the rat race.

1- Serial entrepreneurs are well aware that an idea’s worth practically nothing against execution. However, you might come accross first time entrepreneurs or would-be start uppers asking you to sign a confidentiality pact or non disclosure agreement (NDA). In such a case, rather than narrow-mindedly abide by Guy Kawasaki’s advice and dismiss the entrepreneur, take 2 minutes to explain to the entrepreneurs why you can’t sign the NDA. Basically, just say you can’t do it just because in case someone shows up with an even better business case making use of the exact the same idea, you don’t want to feel handcuffed and not immediatly help this entrepreneur focus on his business rather than financing. Go further in the explanation, and tell the entrepreneur that an idea’s worth nothing until executed. If an idea can be undertaken right away by someone else, it means it’s a crappy idea that would’ve anyways been copied as soon as the first entrant got started. These low entry barriers businesses are worth examining only when exit barriers are low as well. Nothing appeals to entrepreneurs more than learning for bright people like you. So, rather than acting like a demi god whilst you’re actually in a rush to invest these 10 million bucks that have been burning your hands, take 2 of your precious minutes to let the entrepreneur understand the rationale of your thinking. This great first impression will make her/him feel like spending more time with you to keep on learning.

2. Invest time to read all the business plans coming into your mailbox. Not all bright people are connected enough to get an intro, and not all successful entrepreneurs had an established network before actually getting started. So in order not to miss the next big success story, make sure you at least glance at the few documents people have taken time to send to you. And if you don’t have time to, hire an analyst to compile digests for you. There are loads of young bright graduates willing to become VCs: supply excesses demand this time, so it probably won’t cost you too much. Btw, you wouldn’t be doing these young sharp minds a favour when hiring them since the very best VCs are former successful entrepreneurs, sales guys or software developers. The solution might be to hire young MBA graduates with already some operational experience, so that you can train them up to the point where they’re good enough to become dealmakers. Anyways, reading all business plans coming into your mailbox will lower your risk of not spotting the best ideas / brightest entrepreneurs. At a Web 2.0 gathering in Paris several months ago, I remember listening to Stéphane Bohbot (a serial entrepreneur since he graduated from University, now the founder and CEO of Euronext-listed company Modelabs) saying to an ex-ABN Amro VC that he had sent him a description of his first business idea and never got any answer. Too bad, the actual business idea raised 12k euros in angel money and was sold for 30m euros a few years later. Needless to say, Stéphane Bohbot never called ABN Amro back when starting new ventures.

3- Get an intro. Introductions will naturally help you meet with the potentially most successful entrepreneurs: would you want to introduce someone to a Venture Capitalist if you weren’t convinced this entrepreneur is a real top gun? For sure not. How do you, as a VC, get to have people trying to connect you with the right project owners? Firstly, if you’ve got cash available and look for deals, just say it. Secondly, devise a blue ocean strategy to sourcing new deals. You may for instance become a guest lecturer on entrepreneurship at a local engineering school, & offer free advice to the researchers who think of starting up a business. You may also open a blog,

4- It “what”, not “how” that really matters. I’ve always been impressed by the presentation skills of the Anglo-Saxons of all ages. It might be the first time this computer nerd, who probably never read any of Guy Kawasaki or Ouriel Ohayon’s pitching advice, talks outloud to someone about his business. On the other hand, you’ve become an expert in pitching as a former entrepreneur or salesman and now a professional investor. So, try hard to counterbalance this bias and listen to what’s being said, not how it’s been packaged or you’ll end up exclusively funding start ups started by capuccino drinking consultants who’ve learnt one single thing in grad school: how to package nice Powerpoint presentations.

5- Show leads. Show the entrepreneur that, through your established networks, you’ll be capable to bring onboard exactly what the current team lacks: new client introductions through another of your investees targeting the same markets, top-notch financial skills (say the founder is a software developer now too busy to start reading Brealey & Myers), you act as a top executive headhunter – and have already helped one of your investees recruit this bright and experienced European manager to open operations accross the ocean (say the company’s located in the US). To make a long story short, instead of just talking and talking, show concretely how and what you’ll bring onboard on top of your money. Whoever it comes from, money is money. So be aware that an entrepreneur, when offered different term sheets from different VC shop, will select the one that offers the best mix of ‘human fit’ (hardly measurable) and ‘potential external synergies’. So, if you want this investment to happen, show pre-money leads of your ability to generate such synergies.

6- Reputation in this business is key, and the best indicator for your reputation is your ’stickiness rate’. A way for entrepreneurs to check out your reputation is to have a look at your portfolio and see if there are entrepreneurs coming back to you with their second or third company. If you’ve financed, as a venture capitalist, several companies founded by the same entrepreneur, it reveals this entrepreneur was happy with you and believes you are a reliable, long term partner in the development of her/his ventures. In fact, the dream of every entrepreneur is to go with the same investment house So, the more you’ll stick to repeat entrepreneurs (or, let’s put it that way, the more repeat entrepreneurs will stick to you), the more likely you’ll attract the best projects into your portfolio. For instance, Jean-Louis Bénard, a French entrepreneur, who had his first company named FRA funded by AXA Private Equity, just closed a financing round for his second company – namely Brainsonic. Consequently, although AXA PE is already a big name in the European venture capital landscape, an entrepreneur with a top-notch project who might not be aware of the fact that AXA Private Equity is a reliable partner in the development of one’s venture will for sure realize it soon after to talking to Jean-Louis or, even easier, browsing AXA PE’s website.

7- Clearly state right from the beginning the investing process and mention all conditions, even the hidden-in-the-legal-footnotes ones you’re well aware of. This way, you’ll give the entrepreneur a hint of your VC skills. Too strict a condition package or too long a process boils down to you writing “I’m not a top VC” on your forehead. Top investors know what it takes to detect and invest time & money into the best projects and people. You coming up with a never-ending process, hence preventing the entrepreneur from focusing on her/his business rather than road showing. Too narrow a legal frame, too strict performance goals or compliance terms that are too restrictive will show you’re not sure you’ve picked up the right project and consequently want to hedge your investment with a ferocious conditions frameset. As an example, in order to make entrepreneurs save time and focus on their business, start ups funded by Kleiner Perkins and Sequoia spend very little time in the pipeline (pipeline = time between first meeting and cash @ bank) and enjoy a relatively loose framework as long as they remain transparent, investor-friendly, humble about their success and committed to building their business sustainably.

8- If you feel you’re competing with another VC firm on this deal (you will usually not know who it is I guess), acknowledge you’ve got competition rather than just ignoring it. And instead of competing on the valuation or trying to justify it (a good investor never negotiates too much for all the reasons mentioned above), state your unique selling point clearly. You must have something others don’t to be on this deal. Examples: you used to be a software developer and entrepreneur so you may emphatisize with software start up problems; you are a former investor banker so you know how, when and at what valuation to exit; you have strong ties with Asia and this is precisely where the company plans to focus its business development efforts; unlike your potential competitors, you specialize in the same industry as your potential investee; etc. etc. etc. Don’t expect the entrepreneur to find your USP for you. Fundraising is indeed a very stressful moment for any entrepreneur, and since you’ve probably been there 100 times already or so, you may not realize how big bucks distract people from what really matters: value adding human capital like special skills, experience, and a network. So find the right trigger and pull it!

9- Don’t fall for old trick questions. Entrepreneurs will try two trick questions on you in order to assess your degree of cluelessness. (1) “What is your exit horizon?” (2) “What if my figures do not match the business plan, will you sack me?” The right answer for the first question is “Since our fund maturates in n years (2<n<7) and our shareholders expect us to report performance of our investees on this specific date, our exit horizon should near the n year waters. Obviously, we like to follow the companies in our portfolio in their following financing rounds to support their different development & growth stages”. Do not bullshit (it’s possible since most first time entrepreneurs don’t know how venture capitalists operate) saying that you’ll do what it takes to make your investee a success no matter the time horizon because this would be wrong: one day or another, your fund will expire and the time will come for you to exit (at a time the company would better be appealing). I’m not worrying too much on this (1) answer as I know VCs dedicate a lot of time training the entrepreneur on how VC funds work. The right answer for the second question is: “We’re not investing in a business plan, nor are we investing in an idea or even a business model. We’re actually investing in a somebody, and this somebody is you and your team (you all make one body). We’re most of all investing in the capacity of this somebody to learn from one’s mistakes, evolve and adapt according to customer demands and market trends. So, don’t expect us to fire anybody if you don’t exactly match the figures drafted on your business plan. A business plan is a road map to be constantly re-thought and re-issued. However, do expect us to judge you on your ability to do what you say and say what you do. What’s more, we believe you’re smart enough to know where your limits stand and step out in case the company reaches a stage where your managerial capacities reach a ceiling glass. As a shareholder, your interest might be to leave the floor to a more experienced entrepreneur at some point (definitely not in the short run). There are however counter examples and most of the entrepreneurs we’ve worked with get better and better and remain the best person on Earth to run their business. Indeed, we believe the best possible managers are always the founders – when possible”.

10- Do not under deliver. Underdelivering means (3 situations taken from real life examples): a) procrastinate when time for transferring the money comes; a way to spot the best investors: the check is issued no more than a couple minutes after the deal is closed – and conversely, bad investors procrastinate; b) don’t return phone calls. Show respect to the entrepreneur: if (s)he calls you, it means (s)he needs you. As an investor, your job isn’t only to collect the money at exit or dress smart for board meetings but also create value; c) don’t be passive, especially if you do early stage. Or if you’re to be passive, instead of pretending to be active, say it right from the beginning and make sure there are other investors on the same round willing to help.

11- One extra piece. Entrepreneurs never call back people who have not taken them seriously so if you choose not to invest, set up a meeting on the phone to state clearly why rather than having your secretary send a single line by e-mail. Call the entrepreneur and take 5 minutes to help him improve the next time he’s got an idea, or if he eventually gets funding, for the next round of financing. (S)he’ll remember you for being professional and respectful with other people’s time despite you having a busy schedule. Make sure your advice is full of wisdom, helpful, and constructive in a way that the entrepreneur 1) will regret you didn’t pick her/his project up; 2) will feel (s)he’s got a hell lot of things to learn from you and hence will keep you updated for later business (new round or new venture if (s)he’s a repeat entrepreneur).

Tech Days Season in Paris: Microsoft & Sun

It’s Tech Days time in the Paris technology Valley!

MS Tech Days logo

On 5th – 7th February 2007, Microsoft will grant us with a nice learning experience. I’ve been to a couple Microsoft presentations already (one @ Ecole Centrale Paris, where I study, with Pascal Belaud – on the .Net environment; the other @ Microsoft with Eric Mitelette & Benjamin Gauthey), and these guys really rock! I’ll at least make sure I pop up there, the agenda looks really interesting (eg a lecture on digital video by ex-VP Marketing @ Microsoft and blogger Olivier Ezratty, see here).

On 19th – 21st March 2007, it will be time for Sun to run its Paris Tech Days as well. I’ll definitely attend the first day dedidated to Netbeans (I’ve been struggling with it recently and have this huge list of questions to go through).

By the way, very exciting week in perspective. I am to listen to Bill Gates talking at least twice in a couple days! More to come, stay tuned (too bad my camera’s down though).

Steve Jobs Introduces the iPhone on Mad TV

No comment…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p01RjigiYF0]

"453: Deployment Error" when running a web service program on Netbeans: here's the patch

This is a post aimed at a very small stake of my readers. I apologize to the rest of you and promise that if 15,000 of you ask me to, I’ll stop blogging for good and for ever.

Guys, I got it: here and there. It seriously looks like a bug. Solution suggested: stop the application server, open a regular Java app, run it, close Netbeans. Relaunch Netbeans, select your Java web service as a main project, clean it, build it, run it. It should work. If not, let me know. Update 1 (14:58 same day): move from Sun Java Application Server to Tomcat. When compiling the code lines, it seems the parser is unable to find folders that are supposed to be automatically generated. So, no parsing.

Update 2 (16:34 same day): problem with overloading methods (can’t overload more than twice) in Web Service Java + shitty interfacing between Tomcat & MySQL. IBM had already spotted the problem here. Solution: move from the Sun J2EE environment to the Microsoft .Net platform + SQL Server database (seamless integration).

This is where my traffic peak's coming from: top blog "Alarm:Clock" on the CartoReso deal

Frankly, I don’t mean to be arrogant, but I don’t think selling a business (software prototype + business plan + partners + potential clients) for an equity stake on a weblog is so common these days. Hence the fact that I was surprised to get 0 comment, 0 trackback, 0 buzz (but, this is what matters most, 3 e-mails of people interested in the project: keep e-mails coming! We want competition on this deal). This situation now belongs to the past as the European version of top blog Alarm:clock published yesterday a post on CartoRéso & our hunt for an entrepreneur to start up the whole thing for good. Many thanks and congrats to Valérie Thompson from Alarm:clock who for spotting such a move. I hope similar initiatives are to mushroom on all blogs of the Planet to foster entrepreneurship.

Initial post on the CartoRéso deal here.

Catching up on software and entrepreneurship books

From the left to the right:

  • Comment j’ai foiré ma start-up‘, by Nicolas Riou; the story of a discontinued web agency founded in Paris during the New Economy Gold Rush. Funny, takes 45′ to read. Available in French only.
  • Risk & Reward and the making of America’s great industries‘ by Jack Rivkin; insights on the world of venture capital & their impact on the American economic landscape. Brillant but slightly outdated.
  • High Stakes, No Prisoners‘ by Charles Ferguson – not read yet but I’ll keep you up to date.
  • Seize the American dream: 10 entrepreneurial success strategies‘ by Jim Houtz & Kathy Heasley: general stuff on entrepreneurship, very structured book; applies to software companies as well.
  • Hard Drive: Bill Gates & the making of the Microsoft Empire‘ by James Wallace and Jim Erickson – not read yet but, 2 stances from a Microsoftie: 1) not said to be gentle with Microsoft 2) still said to be the best documented book on MSFT. N°1 on my reading list.
  • Ils ont réussi leur start-up!‘ or the Kelbook, by Julien Codorniou & Cyril de Lasteyrie: you read it like you watch a movie; fast-paced writing style, book describing the backstage of Kelkoo, one of the few pan-European success stories in the Internet / software industry, from the birth of the project in a research lab in the Alps to the acquisition by Yahoo! Breathtaking stuff that gives you the drive to entreprendre as soon as you’ve finished the book. A pity it’s available in French only since the Kelkoo story happens in France, true, but also (and mainly?) in Spain, Scandinavia, the UK, Switzerland, etc.
  • Who said Elephants can’t dance?‘ by Lou Gerstner (my review here; by the way, let me know in the comments if you’re interested or not in reading more book reviews on Tech IT Easy in general).
  • The Road Ahead‘ by Bill Gates – I read it when it came out in France back in 1996 I think. Gates describes his vision of the world and how computers in general will integrate more and more with offices and homes. Btw, this is exactly what’s happening today with mobile devices and machines or robots on top of computers. Good historical reading, but getting a bit outdated.
  • Why Butterflies don’t Leave‘ by Erik Stam – interesting small academic book explaining why and how gazelles starting up in a precise location aren’t so likely to move to a better place (I’m fond of topics involving entrepreneurship with spatial development and I believe geographical strategies play a big role in successes and failures). About the book: although my intuition disagrees with some of the outcomes of the research, great work, extremely relevant conclusions in the light of the examples provided (very telling, all located in the Netherlands). Available for free on the Internet over here (.pdf).
  • The Perfect Store: inside eBay’ by Adam Cohen – everything about eBay; I read it 18 months ago and surprisingly can’t remember so much about it. Oh yes, now I remember I enjoyed it a lot: a great pick for those who feel like understanding how to build a successful e-Commerce website with 2 ingredients: a strong business acumen, and technology.
  • Regional Advantage: Culture & Competition in Silicon Valley & Route 128′ by AnnaLee Saxenian. Probably the book that made me make the decision that I would move to the US one day. Believe it or not, although located in the same country, the Valley and the Boston area actually compete to attract the best entrepreneurs and technology start-up companies. Amazing book that I should re-read some day.
  • Opportunity Entry Performance‘ by Marco van Gelderen. Academic research on entrepreneurial project generation. Extremely insightful although I don’t think you would get a chance to purchase it anywhere (I got it from the author who was my Professor at Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus Universiteit).
  • Softwar: an intimate portrait of Larry Ellison and Oracle’ by Matthew Symonds and Larry Ellison – not read yet. Same business as the Kelbook (whose generation was inspired of Softwar): the backstage of the building of Oracle and Ellison’s personality. Said to be an excellent book for those joining the B-to-B software business.
  • The New New Thing: a Silicon Valley Story‘ by Michael Lewis – not read yet although I read 2 other books from Lewis in the past (namely Moneyball and Liar’s Poker). Amazing writer. ‘The New New Thing’ is about Jim Clark (founder of Silicon Graphics & Netscape) and the Healtheon craze.
  • The E-Myth revisited: why most small businesses don’t work and what to do about it’ by Michael Gerber. Out-of-the-box thoughts and advice on entrepreneurial matters. Highly recommended.

Now it’s your turn to contribute:

1) which books dealing with the software industry, venture capital or entrepreneurship would you recommend me to read on top of this list?

2) I’m looking for the 2 best books on Apple and Google (and maybe another one on CISCO). I just can’t make a decision since there are loads of books about these 2 companies. Any idea?

Many thanks for your help.

TechCrunch, MobileCrunch,..SoftCrunch – coming soon

I was wondering today whether there would possibly be a market for another of Mike Arrington’s golden babies, after TechCrunch (USA, France, China, etc.), TalkCrunch, CrunchNotes, CrunchBoard, & MobileCrunch, dedicated to software in particular. Obviously, it would’ve been called SoftCrunch.

So, I thought I was clever and felt like booking the SoftCrunch domain name. Too late! It looks they’re in the process of building the website already (check it here, “Coming Soon” it says). I’m not sure the website was booked by Arrington though, since a quick ‘Who is’ search revealed the registrar’s actually from the UK (by TechCrunch UK, maybe?), with server hosting based in Stockholm, Sweden, and Amsterdam, NL.

If well executed and not too “daily reviews”-like, SoftCrunch can really become a category killer. Today, in order to grasp what’s going on on the software market, you need to visit between 5 and 10 websites (including Tech IT Easy of course, it goes without saying I presume). There’s no clear leader in software blogs, unlike Internet or cooking blogs for instance.

SOA (service-oriented architecture) pitch: an underlying trend in enterprise IT infrastructure

No time for serious blogging tonight, but if I may share a strong belief with you: SOA is no hype or trendy word to use. In my opinion, SOA is a serious, long-term evolutionary way for companies to organize their information flows better, and share resources with their stakeholders more efficiently through a highly flexible infrastructure. More on SOA soon by the way.

In the meantime, I should let you with that video that says practically nothing about how service-oriented architecture is implemented – but it’s still a good pitch on the value chain applications of service-oriented architectures. One thing’s that certain: demand is very high, and SOA departments of all IT service companies are buzzing places.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zV860odGN5Y]

By the way, what’s the limit of time you allow yourself to watch a video on YouTube, MS SoapBox (yet to be released), DailyMotion or MetaCafé? Unless I REALLY want to watch it (Ali G. or Dragon’s Den), 2 minutes 57 seconds is a threshold I hardly break. What about you? My intuition suggests me that when it comes to videobuzzing (a word yet to be patented), the shorter the better.

Web development: Perl is getting hot

I noticed through my RSS reader a boom of Perl web development job offers recently. And frankly, I’m having a hard time trying to understand where the peak comes from. Could you help me figure it out?

If I understand well (I’m everything but an expert…), PERL is a rather old UNIX language devised first to manipulate files, texts and processes through networks. It has perfectly adapted to the Internet era by easing CGI scripts writing and analyses, allowing a soft of universal access to databases, and providing handy file format conversion tools. Right. Two things that PERL seems not to do well are interactive interfaces and scientific calculation. Indeed, since PERL is a script language (like Javascript), performances are rather low when applied to anything else than text.

So, in the light of the current state of the Internet (collective intelligence, semantic algorithms, rich media, video and picture sharing, everyone has become a mini media, huge online advertising market, resurgence of portals, software as a service, social shopping, VoIP, etc.), I still don’t get why Perl development job offers have been peaking so sharply. Web services maybe, or adWords? Help, anyone!!

The Swarm: a software for mobile devices soon to revolutionize relationships between people

People relationships have been evolving quite rapidly recently. If the e-mail has, despite its many flaws, changed the way people communicate, other disruptive new uses like online dating, social networking (professional: LinkedIn; friends on FaceBook; hobbies, etc.), instant messengers (allowing you to let people know whether you’re available or not and leave small notes to the attention of your contacts) have sort of opened new paths to getting to know new people, or helping you keep in touch with people you already know. In this perspective, here’s something new, both a device and a software.

Before we get going, many thanks to Steve D. (whom you’ll hear more about quite soon…) for telling me about this amazing innovation developed by the Smart Internet Technology research group – an Australian digital media think tank, and a researcher at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology named Christine Satchell.

The Swarm, that’s the name of a software (see picture on the right side of your screen), basically allows you to tell your contacts what you’re doing (eg. “In a meeting”; or “I’m driving, not so convenient to pick up the phone”), whether you’re available (“I’m sunbathing on the beach so call back tonight please”) and when you’ll be available (“Free on Saturday night”). You may also separate your professional and private contacts, interface easily the software with your regular digital address book, etc. The software is REALLY EASY to use, and will probably adapt perfectly to the new “finger-driven phones” trend set by Apple and its iPhone. If you don’t believe me and feel like judging by yourself, check out the interactive demo of Swarm over here.

Sources: Techno-Science.net, InternetActu, SmartMobs

US tech start-ups cash burn rate: on average 10K$ per employee per month

On Thursday, January 18th 2007, the Wall Street Journal paper edition published an insightful article (“US tech start-ups don’t flaunt their cash” by Pui-Wing Tam and Rebecca Buckman) on cash, fundraising and tech start-ups. Since I try to use this blog as a way for me to keep track of interesting stuff that I could use later on in my professional life, here’s in a nutshell what you take away from the column:

  • Median amounts invested in round of financing (source: VentureOne): about 8 million USD, stable since 2004, up from 7m$ in 2003 and down from 2000 (11m$).
  • Median time between venture rounds (source: VentureOne): 17 months, stable since 2004, down from 19 months in 2003 and up from 10 months (!) back in 2000 and 14 months in 2001.

Cash burn rate in 2006/2007, competitive figures:

  • Music website Lala.com (20 employees, mostly engineers) founded by serial entrepreneur Bill Nguyen: 200,000$/month
  • Web-based instant messaging Meebo (12 employees), founded by Seth Sternberg: 160,000$/month
  • Software start-up Sharpcast (45 employees, down from 60) founded by Thomas Gibu: 500,000$/month

So, more or less, a relatively accurate figure could be 10K$ / employee / month today vs. 50K$ / employee / month during the hype (the article mentions Paypal: 10m$ a month back in 2000 (headcount: 200)).

Conclusion: there’s NO Web 2.0 bubble. Entrepreneurs have learnt their stripes the hard way and start-up founders, even when trained as engineers, train themselves to become true managers (I remember talking with my pizza delivery guy back in 2000, he was telling me he was planning to quit his job to start an Internet start-up – actually a job board for temporary workers if my memory’s correct, and raise 20 million euros). Actually, valuations are high because VCs have too much free cash to invest so they compete for the best projects – so prices go up; or put it that way, there aren’t enough people with good projects willing to start up a company. The solution: ease, foster, promote entrepreneurship and self initiative.

11 and a geek, already

About an hour ago, I had a little chat with my 11 year-old cousin over MSN. After asking him the regular protocol questions (what’s up? how are you doing in class? etc.), I asked about his computer skills as I remembered he had devised a website a while ago.

The answer: “I’m fine tuning my Php, MySQL, CSS, XHTML, Photoshop skills”.

Wow, I couldn’t believe my eyes. I’m not sure David’s really representative of the next generation, but in the case he is, the technology industry will benefit a lot from young talents that have known and used computers since they were born.

Update 5 minutes after I posted this note: I already got phone calls from headhunters, Microsoft, Google, SAP, Oracle, Dassault Systèmes & Business Objects for them to hire young David. Let’s be clear: let him finish his studies first! ;-) ;-) ;-)

Dragon's Den Pitch BBC version

StoryCode.com Dragon’s Den Pitch

I was advised to write short, funny posts once in a while so there you go.

This video was broadcasted on the BBC. It’s actually the original, British version of Dragon Den (click to verify that American show’s business angels are ways more friendly).

Here’s the website of StoryCode.com, the recommendation start up that didn’t get funding. It seems they have a really, really good team. Btw, Steve Johnston, the founder made 2 mistakes: one structural mistake (still working as a Google consultant whilst starting up a company), and one formal mistake (didn’t pause to listen to what the woman angel had to tell him and tried to push his point rather).

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDczbpIO85g]

Staypressed theme by Themocracy